Help | About | Suggestions | Alms | Chat [0] | Users [0] | Log In | Join
 Search:
Poem: Submit | Random | Best | Worst | Recent | Comments   

Zin/Enough/Things/Squeeze/Flow (Free verse) by gregsamsa222
A Glass of Zin It was three days after your death, and I knew what that meant. We buried you yesterday. You hate spending your nights alone. I passed the time tonight by visiting Our friend, you still remember him I’m sure. Owns the bar on Court Street. No hair. His eyes Squeeze out of his sockets when he’s excited But otherwise they disappear beneath The bags of his lids. No hair. That reminds me of you. So I sat at the bar, and our friend shuffled Towards me. “Darker than usual in here,” I said. “Not really. Maybe it’s just you,” He replied. “Maybe.” The air. You used to insist that A bar wasn’t a bar without the smoke And I smoke and you never did and. And I think I like it better without the smoke Now. For a while I don’t think of the craving, the Sickness, so perhaps I should live out my years Behind bars. Inside bars. The waitress—what is her name?— Stood beside me and leaned across to our friend, Who squinted at her and waited. “Glass of zin,” she said. Our friend disappeared into the darkness, rummaging through The shelves like a librarian. He returned with A bottle of white zinfandel and a shapely wine glass That reminded me of you. When the bottle was uncorked He clutched the bottle by the throat, Tilted it until the slimy pale liquid rushed To the lip, and paused. After a bit, the waitress—I don’t remember her name!— Lifted the empty glass to the ceiling, peering into Its crystal air. She shrugged. She wandered away. It’s been three days. I ordered A glass of zin. What is Enough It was two days after your death, And I wondered about the steps of grief. I am not following them. They are to me Like the MC Escher drawing. The Steps churn and turn, never-ending, a vortex. Everyone said it was a nice funeral. I ordered Your favorite flowers but I must have Forgotten a few—there were so many colors, So much variety, yet they didn’t remind me of you. I don’t know what was said at the funeral. I watched the flowers and tried to recall The times, so many, that you and I stood in a field With the warm spring wind and the calm Spring blooms. You named the flowers. My sister said a few words. A few. Not enough. Beside you I remained as long as I could And it was a lazy Saturday morning again, When I got up early to watch you sleep. I cannot name the flowers. There were hundreds. Red and yellow and purple— The purples must have been violets, maybe Irises, maybe orchids—but they were not enough. There are not enough stages of grief. In the past Week, as the end approached, strangers Pressed copies of soft books into my hands, Saying, “This helped me get through it,” Implying that one stage fits all. It is not enough, is it? I am reading a book now and it urges me to Give in for a while, let it go, give in and let go As if grief were Excalibur. I cannot make sense of it. I wonder if you liked your funeral. I am simply not a person for flowers. You were. Your garden, behind the house, with its Paths leading to more paths, entwining and never-ending, Will soon die because I am not enough. Things It was the day after your death, With the sun creeping across the wood floors As imperceptibly as breath on a summer’s day. I listened to music, sat in your chair, Rummaged through the shoe box in which you Kept all the things that had no normal place. I don’t know why you wanted to save these items. I don’t know the relevance they might have had. A shoe-string, dear? Bright red. Short It cannot be for an adult’s shoe. A program for a play I did not recall seeing. The paper is yellow and brittle. A picture frame without a photograph. The dirty glass held my reflection. The sun closed in on the coffee table, an advancing Army of dull heat. I could see the dust in the air Swirling like anger, and it made me angry, All these things I didn’t understand, these remnants Of a life that was my life and not my life all the same. A marble. A rip of cloth. The arm of a doll. I got up and placed the box on the table as the Sun finally closed in for the kill. It struck at the marble And at the framed glass, was repelled. The sun Shattered into prisms that splattered against the wall, The furniture, the ceiling. I got up to ask you about these Things, forgetting that you could not answer. But witnessing the war the sun had lost, I received the answer anyway. Asking is an insult. Squeeze It is the day of your death, And you don’t know it. You feel it, Though, you sense it the way our cat Predicts the weather. It is instinctual. For the first time in weeks your hand is Squeezing, squeezing, squeezing, clutching my own hand which is unable to squeeze back For fear of giving you enough peace to let go. You must hate me for that. I don’t blame you. We worked so long for this moment and everything Is ready except me. The nurse eases everyone from the Room, ushering them into the hall where I once watched You falling, gasping, crying, fitful with rage, clumps of hair Clutched in your fists. There are sobs. There are murmurs. Your face sags and is not the face I will remember, perhaps, but It is still your face and I lean forward, lean into your scent that is not Your true scent, and I touch my lips to your lips, which feel dry and hot. The squeeze, the opposite of birth, the push, the touch, a last touch, your last Sensation, this squeeze with my hand it must be for release, it must be to release Because it happens instinctually and then you are gone. You are gone. Flow It is a year before your death, But neither of us knows it. You move beneath me like water And I possess the flow of your body, letting it pass Through my fingertips, pressing my chest against the Rolling stream of your back, hips, stomach, breasts, The legs that rise and fall like the tide, the mouth Like a whirlpool, pulling me in, reaching always for Something that is not mortal and is not mine to give. We are night. Glistening sweat Stars us. The night sky reflects on your water body. Your hand moves into my hair and tugs playfully, daringly. I don’t know why such small movements become important But it excites me, just as you begin to boil when I Bite, too hard, the slender canal of your neck. These things That lovers do, they can’t be explained. They are mysterious creatures That push against their surroundings, the slightest movement Causing currents, ripples, tsunamis, hurricanes. These excitements Thrive in the cryptic depths of the ocean and when they come To the surface it is always a surprise. A revelation. And then we are water. We merge and surge. We are the night seas, furious, relentless, beating against the air And ripping into the shores of undiscovered countries. And then we are steam, burning away in a hot rising sun. Our star sweat dries. Our excitements return to the depths. What remains is the sound of breath, the quiet rhythm of Life above sea level, and your breath is straining, even now, Is laced with the last, greatest secret. As we drift off to sleep, Body to body, the sun rises and you mention the appointment Next week. I close my arms around you and begin to know.

Down the ladder: Las Gaviotas

You must be logged in to leave comments. Vote:

Votes: (green: user, blue: anonymous)
 GraphVotes
10  .. 248
.. 50
.. 10
.. 02
.. 10
.. 01
.. 00
.. 00
.. 11
.. 13
.. 28

Arithmetic Mean: 7.0
Weighted score: 7.0
Overall Rank: 84
Posted: July 12, 2004 7:03 AM PDT; Last modified: July 12, 2004 7:03 AM PDT
View voting details
The following users have marked this poem on their favorites list:

Adriaan, evergreen, Lenore, Rainbow_chaser, god'swife, INTRANSIT, Dan garcia-Black, Ranger, wilco, edpeterson, dancin_n_da_moonlite, luzrheroguy, Niphredil, lmp

Comments:
[9] Dovina @ 24.52.157.176 | 12-Jul-04/10:17 AM | Reply
Too long, couldn't get through it, sorry
[9] Dovina @ 24.52.157.176 | 12-Jul-04/10:58 AM | Reply
The last section "Flow" is absolutely great.

I wonder why you placed the three days after death in reverse order. They seem better chronologically. I see the year before death as good at the end though.

Why the indented form on just one section? And the long lines in just one section? It seems better to hold the short-line form throughout.

You will not receive the attention you deserve on poemranker with poems this long. The last section, in particular, could stand alone.

"He clutched it by the throat,"
[9] Dovina @ 24.52.157.176 > Dovina | 12-Jul-04/2:57 PM | Reply
What happened to the comment by Dan garcia-Black and your response to it? I thought they were quite good.
[10] Dan garcia-Black @ 64.161.177.60 > Dovina | 12-Jul-04/4:52 PM | Reply
Reverse chonology. Tricks only work when the writing is good. This WORKS.Dovina must be busy because she is usually much more perceptive than I. At firstI was annoyed that you were posting four poems as one. Then I decided that if you were that sly, maybe you were worth reading. I'm glad I did. I hope that
your writing doesn't require someone to die each time you need inspiration. Well, maybe that's not an impossible situation to overcome. There is a war going on. Plenty of material there. Poems for oil.
[9] Dovina @ 24.52.157.176 > Dan garcia-Black | 12-Jul-04/4:58 PM | Reply
Good evening, Mr. Ghost of Dan.
(you stole what i was going to say - on this poem and said it better)

I agree with everything he just said
[9] ?-Dave_Mysterious-? @ 80.42.112.88 | 12-Jul-04/4:05 PM | Reply
My favorite bit is :

A shoe-string, dear? Bright red. Short
It cannot be for an adult’s shoe.

Genius
[6] -=Dark_Angel=-, P.I. @ 81.86.113.159 | 12-Jul-04/4:22 PM | Reply
I like the way you've crammed several poemes into one submission. It allows the reader to sort of rank your entire life in one go. -6-
[10] SupremeDreamer @ 204.31.170.34 | 13-Jul-04/2:04 AM | Reply
Brilliant. Love the build up..
Blessed with ten.
[10] god'swife @ 4.232.108.43 | 13-Jul-04/5:21 PM | Reply
I'm willing to bet, no matter what other poems I ever read, this will always be the best one. All that I love about literature is contained within this poem.
[n/a] gregsamsa222 @ 24.215.163.188 > god'swife | 13-Jul-04/6:00 PM | Reply
Wow. Thank you.
[10] wilco @ 66.162.22.123 | 14-Jul-04/11:32 AM | Reply
I was turned off by the length of this from someone I hav'nt read before, but now I'm glad I read it anyway. Some of them are better than other (particularly, I think, Zin, Enough and Squeeze) but overall, very good. I'm impressed.
[10] Venus @ 67.165.242.105 | 26-Jul-04/12:58 AM | Reply
Glad I found this one - a big, fat 10.
[n/a] gregsamsa222 @ 24.215.163.188 > Venus | 26-Jul-04/8:25 PM | Reply
thnx
[10] INTRANSIT @ 64.12.116.70 | 27-Jul-04/8:42 AM | Reply
no big pompous words. cliches, used artfully almost unnoticeable. backwards works.
[10] irdaryl @ 24.215.163.188 | 27-Jul-04/6:41 PM | Reply
length has nothing to do w/ greatness.
[n/a] gregsamsa222 @ 152.163.253.4 > irdaryl | 27-Jul-04/6:48 PM | Reply
...and greatness has nothing to do with length.
[10] edpeterson @ 68.79.203.220 > gregsamsa222 | 25-Feb-05/5:44 AM | Reply
ahhh, but without length, you get no work in the porn industry
[10] edpeterson @ 68.79.203.220 | 25-Feb-05/6:06 AM | Reply
The poem: Brilliant. The order is perfect as is the length.
[10] wilco @ 24.165.207.93 | 25-Feb-05/8:29 PM | Reply
Finally, something on the best list that deserves to be there. Well, at least until some anonymous fucking idiot knocked it off. *sigh* Oh well, one day all will be right.
[n/a] gregsamsa222 @ 24.215.162.98 > wilco | 20-Mar-05/1:42 PM | Reply
"Finally, something on the best list that deserves to be there. Well, at least until some anonymous fucking idiot knocked it off. *sigh* Oh well, one day all will be right."

Eh. Anonymous gets a lot of poem-lovin, some of it deserved.
[10] Rainbow_chaser @ 64.229.169.52 | 16-Mar-05/12:18 PM | Reply
WOW! I'm lacking anything to say, other then this poem is brilliant. So touching, so deep. utterly amazing, I disagree with the comments of it being to lengthly. Perfection is all i can think of.
****10****
~Autumn
[n/a] gregsamsa222 @ 24.215.162.98 > Rainbow_chaser | 20-Mar-05/1:44 PM | Reply
Thnx, Autumn. Perfection is a stretch, but so long as u liked it...
[9] James Rykelangeli @ 169.229.90.109 | 18-Mar-05/5:51 PM | Reply
A clearly-written, well-structured, and emotive poem. Very well done! You are quite justified in posting it as one poem: it is, after all, an integrated whole. The reverse chronology also adds psychological and emotional tension.
Still, the poem has difficulties. When the waitress and the owner are interacting, the waitress's presence seems unnecessary, for it's the owner who fetches the zinfandel: "Our friend disappeared into the darkness, rummaging..." Is the owner testing her knowledge of what he likes to drink?
[n/a] gregsamsa222 @ 24.215.162.98 > James Rykelangeli | 20-Mar-05/1:48 PM | Reply
hey--thanks, really, for all the thoughts on this poem. I posted it in july and kinda forgot about the site--suddenly i'm getting responses about it. I think the poem needs some work, and know it's not The Best Poem Ever, so critical input is appreciated. Plus... i must admit, if it inspires anyone to think about it longer than it takes to read it makes me feel as if I've managed to get SOMEthing across.
[n/a] gregsamsa222 @ 24.215.162.98 > James Rykelangeli | 28-Mar-05/7:51 PM | Reply
Not entirely sure of what you mean... I mean, I simply meant that a waitress walked up to the barman and and asked him to get a bottle of zin, a scene i had observed several times while hanging out with a friend of mine who worked at a crappy bar. If anything, I kinda meant the emphasis to be on the waitress noting that there was nothing in the glass, but serving it anyway because it was not her place to question what other people choose to consume. Maybe I should reread with your question in mind...
[9] James Rykelangeli @ 169.229.90.109 | 18-Mar-05/6:16 PM | Reply
On second thought, keep "items." Its impersonality is appropriate for the following line.
...Sorry, my commentary was cut off. Let me continue, and please ignore the short comment above -- my computer is on the fritz.
The flowers bit is rather trite, as flowers tend to be. You could get rid of the "I cannot name the flowers" stanza, which lacks any outstanding material, and insert the "they were not enough" motiff that comes at the end elsewhere to form a smooth transition into the "There are not enough stages of grief" stanza that follows.
Also, finding the deceased's treasure-trove is trite: a picture frame, a marble, a shoe-string... it reads like a Hallmark card. Perhaps by inserting more personalized items, you can give the reader a better idea of the deceased's character, which you so loved.
It seems to me that if you were to pursue poetry further, you could begin to produce some really excellent material. Given the universality of the sentiments expressed in this poem, might I suggest your next poem, as a sort of exercise, focus on something more esoteric?
I particularly enjoyed the language and ideas in Flow and in the following excerpts:
"Sun finally closed in for the kill.... The sun shattered into prisms that splattered against the wall..."
"For fear of giving you enough peace to let go."
"The squeeze, the opposite of birth."
It would take up too much space were I to further examine this poem, but I'll make one last suggestion: as it really is an integrated whole -- integrate it. Get rid of the names to the subpoems, and give it an overall name. Once again, superb.
[10] zodiac @ 212.118.19.192 | 18-Mar-05/10:04 PM | Reply
With the possible exception of the shoestring, nothing - no image, line, phrasing, structure, or anything else really - is very original here. You'd be great for writing a dictionary of poetic tropes.
[10] edpeterson @ 68.79.58.40 > zodiac | 19-Mar-05/1:20 PM | Reply
Novelty is overrated. Here, a story is being told and being told well. How original is it to die? Doesn't make the death of someone you love any less painful or important or novel.

The writing is direct and concrete. It is written with both skill and emotional restraint, to the degree which is possible anyway.

I can hear an argument that this is not poetry, and, as I am not really a poet, I would not argue. I would argue if one were to posit that this is not exemplary writing. It is.
[n/a] gregsamsa222 @ 24.215.162.98 > edpeterson | 20-Mar-05/1:57 PM | Reply
It really wasn't written to be novel or new or the next 'howl' so thanks for reading it on its on terms.
[n/a] gregsamsa222 @ 24.215.162.98 > zodiac | 20-Mar-05/1:50 PM | Reply
Thanks. At least I'm good for writing something.
[10] thepinkbunnyofdoom @ 4.224.24.132 | 19-Mar-05/8:18 AM | Reply
As I'm sure you've been told, this is god aweful long.

Each of these poems are great. I love the images and the way that you have painted with the canvas of my heart.

If these poems wouldn't all have had worked together, exactly the way they do, my vote would have been a 5(one for each poem here), just for being so long. But as is, 10. Excellent writing.

<3 Jason
[n/a] gregsamsa222 @ 24.215.162.98 > thepinkbunnyofdoom | 20-Mar-05/1:52 PM | Reply
No fair. I've currently got 'the best poem' on here but you've got a bajillion in the top 20. I think you're the reigning monarch of poemranker.
[10] thepinkbunnyofdoom @ 66.42.229.217 > gregsamsa222 | 20-Mar-05/8:19 PM | Reply
Only because the true kings feel like letting me be.

<3 Jason
[10] INTRANSIT @ 4.159.212.243 | 20-Mar-05/4:24 PM | Reply
i think I did a deep scan of this the first time. This time I swam in it. angry dust. perfect. 100. again.
[10] evergreen @ 4.155.240.4 | 27-Mar-05/1:48 AM | Reply
::gasp::

in the best possible way. some of this has been done before, and bits done better, and some of the phrase could use tweaking. as a whole, it's damn near perfect and that's my opinion.
[10] dancin_n_da_moonlite @ 205.188.116.139 | 2-Apr-05/10:51 AM | Reply
this is one of the most beautiful things i have ever read, and the way it just kept me going from one part to the next is amazing, i usually dont like things this long but this is beauitufl
[10] storyspinner @ 68.67.205.23 | 14-Apr-05/8:45 PM | Reply
Stunning! Crisp and clean. Remarkably distant sounding with so much more emotion hinted at actually said.
[9] oneglove @ 67.96.13.98 | 10-May-05/5:05 PM | Reply
this story really drew me in, though like youve said there are parts that could use revision. i understand though, sometimes its more important just to get it all down than to perfect each phrase.
[n/a] Niphredil @ 132.68.1.29 | 16-May-05/10:18 AM | Reply
It touched me. I think it is a beautiful poem.
[10] Enkidu @ 204.98.2.23 | 19-May-05/11:42 AM | Reply
...
[10] Lenore @ 64.252.101.156 | 8-Jul-05/10:47 AM | Reply
It’s strange but I feel guilty. The kind of guilt one might feel after reading someone’s diary.
This work is so personal, so strong. It should be rolled up and tied up with the small red string that she left for you in that box. There’s more to say but I can’t.
Thank You.
[8] Sisterwolf @ 207.69.139.9 | 23-Dec-05/1:39 PM | Reply
Stunning work. I adore the poetic device of reverse
chronology - it gives it a stronger feeling of the death. Though it is long, it is a great read and kept my attention right through. Good job!
[10] lmp @ 141.154.134.3 | 30-Dec-05/2:02 PM | Reply
well, i creid. i smiled, i nodded with understanding of those emotions. hopefully, i will not ever have to endure the "squeeze". ugh!
as others have said, the reverse works for me. it also leads us in an interesting slow growth to the painful climax, and then a joyous denoument, and then the ominous ending lines...
the impending doom of the garden would itself make an interesting stage for another piece of writing.
sorry for the long comment. and sorry for your loss.
[10] Ranger @ 62.252.32.15 | 28-Jan-06/5:44 AM | Reply
I've got nothing to say that others haven't already said...this goes onto my favourites list...
[9] smoofle @ 88.106.175.245 | 24-Feb-06/10:55 AM | Reply
Wow. Just... wow.
[10] Dark Angle @ 70.181.103.149 | 3-Dec-07/12:29 AM | Reply
Very nice stuff here.
1096 view(s)




Track and Plan your submissions ; Read some Comics ; Get Paid for your Poetry
PoemRanker Copyright © 2001 - 2024 - kaolin fire - All Rights Reserved
All poems Copyright © their respective authors
An internet tradition since June 9, 2001