SupremeDreamer -- ??? -- 30-Aug-03/7:58 AM
courtroom banter. detective WATSON.. WHAT SON? its brother D. for diarrhea. he diluted his usual shit this time.. just to make it as long as my poem... but then he speaks of "long rants" while engaging IN JUST THAT. Its a strange thing to notice mind you.. his retardation.. its very hard to spot, but its there, trust me sister z.
-=Dark_Angel=- -- ??? -- 30-Aug-03/9:11 AM
For your information Watson was a doctor not a detective. Once again you fail.
SupremeDreamer -- ??? -- 30-Aug-03/9:24 AM
Dark... think: A Doctor, more precisely: United States psychologist considered the founder of behavioristic psychology. 2: what does this have to do with being a detective? Analyzing data, building up conclusions, etc, ill let you fill in the rest so, you see, i havent failed in the slightest you moron. now go shove your sherlock holmes pipe up your ass, and shut the fuck up.
-=Dark_Angel=- -- ??? -- 30-Aug-03/11:03 AM
So you just happened to call him a detective because let's face it - he is a bit like a detective, isn't he? And this had absolutely nothing to do with the fictional Doctor Watson who is often confused with Detective Watson? I have no problem with the Watson in this piece being the psychologist, but why you decided to call him a detective is beyond me. All that guff about analysing data and building up conclusions is cobblers and you know it. All doctors do that. You don't call everyone who analyses data a detective, do you? Maybe you do.
SupremeDreamer -- ??? -- 30-Aug-03/11:26 AM
I call you a detective because you do not posses the intelligence of a doctor, and your methodes are crude.
-=Dark_Angel=- -- ??? -- 30-Aug-03/11:42 AM
Oh right. It all makes sense now. Afterall, Detectives aren't as intelligent as doctors and their methods are renowned for their crudeness. Nice one!
-=Dark_Angel=- ??? 30-Aug-03/4:56 PM
Oh so you haven't generalised. You decided to call me a detective not a doctor because I don't have the intelligence of a doctor, and because my methods are crude, but that's not to say a detective is generally less intelligent than a doctor, nor that a detective's methods are generally more crude than a doctor's, it's just that I am a special detective who is different from actual detectives in that I am stupid and crude. Didn't you think at any point that given the fact that you don't think detectives are GENERALLY considered less intelligent or more crude than doctors, that if you wanted to highlight my lack of intelligence and crudeness then perhaps you should have called me something other than a detective? Just a quick heads-up FYI. Cheers. We'll touch base later this week.
SupremeDreamer -- ??? -- 30-Aug-03/8:37 PM
Special? That your stupid and crude? Are you actually bothered by my mindless rambling? tsk. I dont think detectives are generally less intelligent than doctors dark. End of debate. I currently am not using my ole brain to come up with better come backs. Thats all... You talk alot just to say this: I am throwing retarded statements into the air, without a second thought as to what im saying. Your whole process of explaining this.. is like watching a PI beat around the bush hinting away at shit.. when you could simply get to the goddamned point and save me the debate. Maybe your not crude.. maybe you just have a need to yammer on in a way that makes you look good.. or you just love to talk.. like me. What else would you like me to call you? I've called you a closet irishman, a detective, a dysphoric clown, the little drummer boy, etc.. Btw: irishman + detective.. yeah.. i love it when i get oh so cliche. I have managed to grow wings btw! dont they look pretty? and ive gained my special badge of honor: Clown. -wink- About touching base later this week: why wait? ive made your point for you... or, you could always push and do an elaborate speech about how i think detectives are not as intelligent as doctors and use it to say im retarded. I can say im retarded.. just to save you the long speech.
-=Dark_Angel=- -- ??? -- 31-Aug-03/8:13 AM
Read what I said. My point, ultra-simplified, is this: a) you said you called me a detective because I don't have the intelligence of a doctor and because my methods are crude. b) but then, after I pointed it out to you, you claimed that you don't think detectives are generally less intelligent than doctors, nor do you think their methods are generally more crude. c) but you still called me a detective rather than a doctor. d) why did you do this? e) It cannot have anything to do with my intelligence or the crudeness of my methods when compared to a doctor's since you just said that detectives aren't generally more stupid or more crude than doctors. f) Unless you think I'm sort of special detective who is different from actual detectives in that I am stupid and crude. g) yeah that must be it. Now do you see?
wKing Abdullah IIw -- Detective vs Doctor (The Explaination) -- 1-Sep-03/12:41 AM
Note to -=Dark_Angel=- Dear sir, Please do not respond to Y2kSlamPoete's latest flimsy post. It's blatantly obvious that he's a shameless liar. We all know he made the mistake of calling you "Detective" Watson as a result of his crippling ignorance. It is very obvious that he is attempting to cover up for his error by posting this rambling self-justificatory missive, the gist of which is that he *deliberately* called you "Detective" Watson because the word "Doctor" was singularly inappropriate for someone unqualified in medical matters. He's so transparent in his clumsy manoeuvring and so patently dim-witted in the execution of his designs that you are saved the task of pointing out his numerous glaring errors. Yours &c. Abdullah x x x x x
-=Dark_Angel=- -- ??? -- 1-Sep-03/4:04 AM
Official -=Dark_Angel=- Comment Analysis... 100% Complete Extraordinarily inept comebacks are an early sign that the patient is clutching at straws. His therapy appears to be going nowhere. Detective Watson, M.D
SupremeDreamer -- ??? -- 1-Sep-03/4:49 AM
"that the patient is clutching at straws" I dont like cocaine, its a waste of money when i can get methamphetamines that have a longer lasting effect. Your therapy notes look more like a drug rehab report. If you were a noteable therapist of value, you would be running a profitable sit-down operation in Beverly Hills, and not forced to degrade yourself by working with druggies at poorly financed rehab centers. Ofcourse, you could claim that you like to work probono, to help save those who have not seen the truth of Jesus. They'll let any bozo do it.. even bozos who are confused as to the particular addiction a patient is suffering from. Btw, does M.D stand for "Medical Detective"? Is this the P.I. version of "Medical Examiner" also known as a coroner? I don't think the dead would benefit from your psychoanalysis, but it would be amusing to read notes saying: "The patient is pale, slightly bluish, i conclude that he suffers severe depression, which explains his lack of motivation" Your a hoot darkie, really.
SupremeDreamer -- ??? -- 1-Sep-03/5:32 AM
Oh, I forgot something, I was wondering if you would bless me not with your bad therapy, but with your ability to find fault in so-called logic. I would like a report as to the strength of my Official Explaination concerning the issue of what title is proper for the work that you perform, pointing out the use of investigative methodes, and not actual in depth psychology which requires actually healing a patient. Now do not confuse the issue with a flimsy theory that i think detetives are inferior. Simply put: detectives do not heal patients, they collect and piece together evidence to either find out who commits a crime, or to provide solid evidence to secure a win for the state prosecutor in court proceedings against criminals charged for an offense. A psychologist goes through lengthy analyzation to understand the mental workings of his patient to provide an eventual improvement in the patients mental well-being. It may be true that psychology is used to provide law enforcement a glimpse into the possible workings of a criminal to help them in their investigation, but it is still detective work based on analyzing crime scene evidence to piece out an outline of the criminals mind, etc. None of this includes possible theraputic options to cure the criminal. You must admit that you are not someone who is concerned with helping a person, but are only interested in providing a social court with evidence to prove your charges. If you disagree, it would be proper to provide evidence that discredits my explaination defending the use of the title "detective" in the nickname I tagged onto you.
Don-Quixote -- ??? -- 1-Sep-03/6:21 AM
I suffer an extreme case of psychotic neurosis, obsessive in nature, accompanied with sadistic goals and a need to exterminate all traces of his adversary. Lengthy consideration of the patient brings me to conclude that there is little hope of helping him forgive his so-called enemy, which means we shall never be able to start healing his extreme insecurity. ---- yup, yup.. i can bullshit and play doctor too, but i still wouldnt tag myself one, because i have not studied to learn the craft of therapy. And I am not an egotistical shithead who needs to be labeled Dr. and not Detective. I also think his theory about me thinking detectives are inferior to doctors is his own feelings and not mine. My theory is that he desperately feels he is above the level of detective and must seek vengeance for being disgraced with what he considers the "lesser" of the two occupational titles. Yes, yes, theres much to consider.
-=Dark_Angel=- ??? 4-Sep-03/7:45 AM
Dear Sir, I am writing to you now in my seventy-eighth year, and, in particular, following the shameless deletion of the poemranker transcripts documenting the course of events throughout this debate. Given the scale of the Detective vs Docter inquiry, not to mention the importance of such matters in determining your future at poemranker, with particular emphasis on any possible decisions made, on your part, to resign from office, you leave me no choice but to continue my onslaught on the very buttocks of your flimsily stained character. So without further ado, save to mention the fact that I have, in my archives, a copy of the original webpage on which these discussions took place, and that this copy was made because I knew you would probably try to delete the evidence, I shall begin. The extraordinary lengths to which you have stooped in order to concoct this elaborate explanation for what was a simple mistake on your part is the most whimsical jape of the season. Is your logic flawed? Is it *possible* that you called me a detective because I don't try to cure things but I do try to investigate them? Of course it is. But is it likely? No. It is not. The very fact that it took you three attempts to come up with this latest "new official response" already casts a rather brown shadow of doubt over the pestilent contours of your lying face. You criticise me for never accepting the answers you give me, yet you continue to change your tune whenever I question them. Are you really going to stand there and accuse me of being stubborn for doubting the veracity of your first two responses whilst simultaneously claiming that, actually, your third response is your "official" response and the other two were just "lame"? Good Christ I hope not. Is it pure coincidence that you decided to call me Detective WATSON as opposed to Detective Freud or Detective Jung, both of whom are far more famous as psychologists than Watson ever was? When people think of Watson they think of Sherlock Holmes, they think of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, they think of pipe tobacco and opium binges (note casual reference to drugs which are naughty), and, if they are particularly ignorant, they think of the non-existent Detective Watson. Am I to believe that your decision to call me Detective Watson, after a not-very famous psychologist who wasn't a detective anyway, and the existence of a fictional Doctor Watson, a very famous character in a vary famous series of books ABOUT A DETECTIVE, are totally unrelated? Good Christ I hope not. Yours sincerely, Detective Watson, M.D
|
