Replying to a comment on:

The Golden Rule (Free verse) by Quarton

Painstakingly, the omnipotent one kneaded and shaped each figure, pausing on occasion to admire His work; fingers deftly molding the eternal clay into a reflection of self, in His likeness, perfect image embodied and aware. His creations multiplied and were many though he also engendered illusion and in a singular, enigmatic way, part of Himself became alone and afraid. Unaware we are God's perfect image, with dualism perceived as reality; what purpose life's bumpy road, why was temporal from eternal made? Should we then give thanks to our God, never questioning life's many absurdities? Repeating over and over ad nauseum, how He works in mysterious ways? A mother cradles her precious child, the essence of unconditional love. But what of God and His children; is His love for them somehow less? For if magically given His powers, who amongst us would not intercede; to end all life's pain and sorrow, do we not deserve the same? Perhaps an answer in point to this paradox not easily solved; is to fairly do unto others as you would have others do unto you. With that thought firmly in place, I sense hypocrisy from Heaven's gate and am inclined to respectfully inquire; "why not follow your own golden rule?"

-=Dark_Angel=-, P.I. 18-Jan-03/4:30 AM
Come on, Quarton. Stop kidding yourself. Stephen Hawking is the most famous scientist in the world. He does ADVERTISEMENTS on TELEVISION. He is constantly parodied. People are obsessed with him. And why is that? Do you really think it's because he's such a good physicist? Fuck no. 90% of people who recognise Stephen Hawking probably couldn't even tell you he's a physicst, let alone anything about his work.

It's because he lives in a talking, flying wheelchair. He has a robotic voice that is simultaneously comical and terrifying. His face is grossly distorted, and the glimmer of life in his expressions are as hideous as they are reassuring that the wheelchair doesn't control the talking machine. Do you think "A Brief History of Time" sold so well because it was a good book? Of course not. Most people who have it gave up halfway through. IT SOLD BECAUSE IT HAD A PICTURE OF A DEFORMED, GRIMACING PHYSICIST IN A WHEELCHAIR WITH A ROBOTIC VOICE.

Now I am not saying that he is somehow a bad physicist, although you are hellbent on putting those words in my mouth. All I am saying is that his opinion is respected more than it should be in certain areas of physics. Surely you can see that this would be true. It's common sense. You can go on about his work "transcending" his physical problems, and for all I know that's true, because it sounds pretty magical and great, but it has little to do with why he's so famous or influential.

And I did watch "Gangs of New York" with him last night. And I shan't be telling him you said hello.




Track and Plan your submissions ; Read some Comics ; Get Paid for your Poetry
PoemRanker Copyright © 2001 - 2024 - kaolin fire - All Rights Reserved
All poems Copyright © their respective authors
An internet tradition since June 9, 2001