Replying to a comment on:

The Golden Rule (Free verse) by Quarton

Painstakingly, the omnipotent one kneaded and shaped each figure, pausing on occasion to admire His work; fingers deftly molding the eternal clay into a reflection of self, in His likeness, perfect image embodied and aware. His creations multiplied and were many though he also engendered illusion and in a singular, enigmatic way, part of Himself became alone and afraid. Unaware we are God's perfect image, with dualism perceived as reality; what purpose life's bumpy road, why was temporal from eternal made? Should we then give thanks to our God, never questioning life's many absurdities? Repeating over and over ad nauseum, how He works in mysterious ways? A mother cradles her precious child, the essence of unconditional love. But what of God and His children; is His love for them somehow less? For if magically given His powers, who amongst us would not intercede; to end all life's pain and sorrow, do we not deserve the same? Perhaps an answer in point to this paradox not easily solved; is to fairly do unto others as you would have others do unto you. With that thought firmly in place, I sense hypocrisy from Heaven's gate and am inclined to respectfully inquire; "why not follow your own golden rule?"

-=Dark_Angel=-, P.I. 17-Jan-03/5:28 PM
Talking of Stephen Hawking, I watched Gangs of New York with him this evening. He thought it was ace. Which just goes to show that he doesn't know everything about everything. If you are as famous as he is, with the reputation he has, it is not surprising that people ask him questions that don't really have any relation to his work. The general consensus, as far as I can see, is that he has done some good research into black holes but is not some sort of mystical prophet or something. The main reason for his fame is that he is in a wheel chair, speaks with that electronic voice and keeps saying

"AS WE MOVE INTO THE FUTURE, THE MYSTERIES OF THE U-I-NI-VERSE WILL BE WITHIN THE GRASP OF MODERN SCIENCE" etc.

You are apparently still clinging to your idea that light is both a particle and a wave. It is not. Anyone with a degree in physics will tell you this. We *model* light as a wave sometimes, and as a particle sometimes. The business of physics is creating models, not pronouncing deep facts about the world. You do not seem to have grasped this. Perhaps they do not teach that in A-level physics. I can't remember, because I am so elderly and wise.

As for the Law of Contradiction, it is simply ~(A&~A). The Bertrand G. Wronglotion Quantum Challenge 2003 is thus to derive statements which counter this law. You have as yet failed to do this. I believe you will continue to fail. 'We could not -say- of an "unlogical" world how it would look.'




Track and Plan your submissions ; Read some Comics ; Get Paid for your Poetry
PoemRanker Copyright © 2001 - 2024 - kaolin fire - All Rights Reserved
All poems Copyright © their respective authors
An internet tradition since June 9, 2001