Ranger19 Mar 2006

The thing with a definition is that it can be one hundred percent correct...and still have no correlation to reality. For instance, I can define a unicorn - despite the fact that no unicorns actually exist. What I'm saying here is that 'love' can be defined, can be explained and can be advocated all day long, but without direct experience of it, it cannot be believed in. Again I say, it's possible to believe that it *might* exist without having belief (i.e. certainty, conviction) that it absolutely *does* exist.