zodiac31 Aug 2005

I'd like to suggest that you prefer Summum creation theories because, one, the word Summum is kind of funny and fun to say, and, two, because when you say you prefer Summum creation theories people look at you and say 'wow, that's pretty out there, man,' and don't know enough about what your talking about to object. Summum creation is not substantively different from any other creation including the one where the world's on the back of a floating tortoise. And it's high time you admitted that Summum philosophy, both as you've quoted it and as it's actually said, has nothing to do with antimatter, and you just made that part up.

As far as nothingness goes (and, despite everything, apparently continues to go), it's silly to say that the potential of nothingness to create something comes from the nothingness itself and not from the something-created. Besides that, there's no reason to believe nothingness ever created anything. Again, that strikes me as something that you believe in so you can believe in God. Which is kind of a backwards way of going about things, if true.